Search This Site




Philadelphia Weekly - The Trouble With Spikol


 

 

 

 

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)

 

 

« Democrats in power: like a warm bath. | Main | I must remember this is a public forum »

Testing my resolve

429904265_8a78036333.jpg

I am against the death penalty, and I work for an organization that advocates for humane treatment of incarcerated people. But the following case is a serious test of my willpower on both counts.

Angel Reyes was in court this week in nearby Delaware County to try to get his death sentence revoked. Reyes killed his toddler daughter, Marcia, after a fight with her mother. He was so pissed off, he grabbed Marcia, took her to a bridge and tossed her into Ridley Creek below. He knew she couldn't swim, and he knew she would die. After he dropped her in he came home, triumphant.

He was given the death sentence in 1994, and that penalty was upheld through years of legal wrangling. But his lawyers argued that if a jury was able to hear about Reyes' tragic childhood, they might reconsider. From the Delaware County Daily Times:

Reyes grew up in an impoverished home in Puerto Rico under the fist of an abusive father, who would beat his children with anything handy -- a bar, a rod, or his bare hands. They would be deprived of food for days as punishment. That led the adult Reyes, according to a defense psychiatrist, to be unable to control his anger and explained his sadistic behavior on the Fourth Street Bridge.

This latest court appearance was the first time Reyes expressed remorse for a crime he never denied committing. He told the jury he's found God, but they reaffirmed his death sentence anyway.

I appreciate the depth of Reyes' childhood trauma and don't argue that he's a damaged soul. The psychiatrist made the best case he could. But I can't say I feel that history mitigates his crime. I don't see the point of state-sponsored murder, but ...

What do you guys think?


[Photograph by StormyinGA]

Comments

I'm against the death penalty in all cases, as it makes me a murderer since the government is killing in my name. I think letting murderers live in less beneficial conditions (no entertainment, tasteless food, etc) for the rest of thier lives is enough. I believe anyone who kills his or her child is mentally ill anyway.

In Canada no one has been executed since the early 60s and we are among all the other
western powers who do not murder in the name of the state. There are at least 5 cases of mistaken verdicts where before capital punishment the accused would have been hung. How many executions can be justified for one mistake.
What about Texas where Bush would laugh when he denied clemency and to quote Blazing Saddles to often when there is no obvious offender "...the nigger gets it."

Liz, I admire your honesty in saying that these horrible sadistic cases test your resolve. They test mine too, as I wonder "what can be the good in keeping such a person alive?" And then I breathe a sigh of relief, because I know that my stance against the death penalty is stronger than the pain and anger and revulsion provoked by any of the world's daily horrors....

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

self portrait web final.JPG

Liz Spikol is senior contributing editor of Philadelphia Weekly. She writes the award-winning column The Trouble With Spikol, which began as a chronicle of her struggle with mental illness, and has since expanded into humorous musings on everything from graphic novels to how to use a mop. She also writes the paper's book review column, Lit Gloss. This blog -- named one of the Top 10 Bipolar Blogs of 2007 by PsychCentral -- is about mental illness policy, news, personal journeys and more.