Search This Site




Philadelphia Weekly - The Trouble With Spikol


 

 

 

 

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)

 

 

« I was out | Main | Speaking of photos... »

Loss of perspective, part II

me in metro.jpg
Today there's an article in the Metro, a daily newspaper in Philadelphia, about this blog. The guy who wrote the piece, Josh Cornfield, was very nice and professional. I enjoyed talking to him even though I knew I was being less articulate than I wanted to be because I was distracted. Vince was waiting for me in the car outside, and I felt like I had to speak very quickly. I figured, "Well, maybe Josh isn't a fast typist, in which case maybe he'll only get a few things I'm saying." I assumed the piece would be very tiny. (What I learned today is that Josh is indeed a very fast typist.)

Then he asked if a Metro photographer could come take my photo—while Vince waited in the car some more. (Vince had to be nice about it because it was my birthday, and on my birthday he has to be in a good mood no matter what.) I was wearing an unflattering bra, my hair was frizzed out, I had no makeup on and I was bloated from snack foods consumed during my computer training. I said, "Well, I'm kind of having a bad hair day," but I knew I'd have to get the photo taken. I'm a journalist. I know how the game is played. I hoped it would run as small as a postage stamp.

Instead the photo is 3 1/2 by 7. It's huge. I'm facing away from the camera, making my chin lose all definition. My arms bulge like sausages against the photo's frame. My boobs are a shelf. My hair looks like it was cut by a blind man. It looks better online, but the printed version, which is cropped against those arms, is washed out and ill-defined. If I were photographer Rikard Larma, I'd be frustrated by how my shots looked on newsprint.

I asked a co-worker if that's what I look like. He said I looked fat in the photo but that I don't look like that in real life. Well, at least someone knows the truth. I feel badly to learn how shallow I am. Why should I care what the photo looks like? But I look at it and I think, "Who's going to go to that blog? The blog of Sausage Arms?"

Yesterday I was able to contextualize to make myself feel better. But today I'm kind of worried, from a medication standpoint. If it's the Effexor that's causing this weight gain, what will I do? Is it a side effect I can live with? It seems incredibly depressing to me to be overweight, but not clinically depressing. Effexor brought me back from an abyss that I simply can't afford to slip into again. And I'm willing to deal with its side effects, whether loss of libido or night sweats. But am I going to be fat? I'm not sure I can handle that.

Many people who take psychotropic meds complain about weight gain. And many prescribing doctors deride their concerns. But what could be more essentially important than one's appearance? When the meds are working, we forget how horrible it was to be without them, and problems like weight gain come to the foreground.

I'll never again say, "What's 10 or 20 pounds if you stop hallucinating?" It's not always an acceptable tradeoff.

Blog’s aim: Break down stigma of mental illness

Comments

Liz, this is quite a change from yesterday's very uplifting post.

I know it will sound absolutely unconvincing and even facetious to you right now, but you look perfectly fit and attractive. No one would think that you look fat, at least from that one photograph. And I'm sure your other readers will agree with me here.

I'm not going to write that you should stop being excessively self-critical because it's in the nature of the beast and the favorite past time for all of us depressives, but I do hope that your spirits lift and you are back to being your funny, witty self pronto!

Liz,

I checked out your blog after seeing you in the metro and was surprised at your feelings about your picture. When I saw you in the metro I thought you were an attractive woman. I didn't see anything negative about your appearance at all.

Liz, you look great -- very healthy! Love your glasses, also.

By the way, your boobs look fine!!

Hey Liz,
I work at a mental health center in west phila. I often read your column. Today our consumers read and were quite interested in the article that appeared in the metro. Our agency is very involved in an ongoing transformation in the implementation of mental health services in Philadelphia to offer a more recovery oriented model of service provision. Anyhow, my consumers are very interested in your blog. Keep it up! They need a voice.

Hi there!

First of all, I want to say that your picture is fine and you're being way overanalytical. You look beautiful! (And I really mean that considering I'd never heard of you before and took the time to remember this Web address before chucking my copy of Metro in the trash.)

Also, I'm starting up a Weblog focused specifically on depression-related items and I was hoping that I would be able to link to you. It's brand new and I'm trying to compile links of helpful items for the blog. You seem like a prime resource!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

self portrait web final.JPG

Liz Spikol is senior contributing editor of Philadelphia Weekly. She writes the award-winning column The Trouble With Spikol, which began as a chronicle of her struggle with mental illness, and has since expanded into humorous musings on everything from graphic novels to how to use a mop. She also writes the paper's book review column, Lit Gloss. This blog -- named one of the Top 10 Bipolar Blogs of 2007 by PsychCentral -- is about mental illness policy, news, personal journeys and more.